top of page
American Pigeon Museum

Are Pigeons Like Children? by Richard Gray

Birds identify objects in the same way as infants learning words.


  • University of Iowa scientists taught pigeons to use touchscreen computers

  • The birds learned to sort 128 different pictures into 16 basic categories

  • The pigeons were rewarded with pellets of food with each correct answer

  • They took 64 days to learn how different objects fitted into each category

  • Scientists say this is similar to how parents begin teaching children words


They may only have a brain the size of a thimble, but it appears pigeons can categorise and name objects in the same way a human children learn new words.



A new study from the University of Iowa has shown that the birds are capable of learning to categorise 128 different photographs into 16 basic categories.


Scientists taught three pigeons to attribute different breeds of dog or types of shoe, for example to a particular symbol in exchange for a reward.


When they were shown black and white pictures of previously unseen dogs or shoes, the birds were able to correctly attribute these to the corresponding symbols.


The scientists behind the project say this is a similar approach taken by young children when they are first learning words for objects.


However, the researchers said it took their birds around 40 days to perfect the task of learning just 16 categories.


Professor Edward Wasserman, a psychologist at the University of Iowa who led the work, said: ‘Our birds’ rate of learning appears to have been quite slow. Human adults regularly learn 16 categories in the space of an hour, yet, pigeons took 45,000 trials to reach their associative limits.


‘Would children learn faster than pigeons? Almost certainly. However, our pigeons came to the experiment with literally no background knowledge.


‘They did not understand the nature of the “task”, they had not encountered these categories before, and they had empty lexicons.


‘Children, on the other hand, bring all of these things to bear on the problem of learning words.


‘Thus, the more relevant comparison group may be newborn infants, who indeed take 6–9 months to learn their first words.’


On each training day, the researchers presented each of the pigeons with 128 randomly ordered images.


Each image fitted into one of 16 categories – baby, bottle, cake, car, cracker, dog, duck, fish, flower, hat, key, pen, phone, plan, shoe, tree.



The birds then had to peck on one of two different colour symbols presented to them on a touchscreen computer – one that was associated with the correct category and the other the wrong category.


If the birds selected the correct symbol they were rewarded with a pellet of food. Incorrect choices plunged the birds into darkness foir a new seconds.


After the training, the birds were then presented with images from the categories they had not seen before to see if they could correctly attribute them.


The pigeons had to select coloured symbols as in the above example were taught to associate with objects.


The pigeons had to select the symbols that correctly corresponded to images they were shown on a screen.


One of the birds reached an accuracy of 80 per cent, a second achieved 70 per cent accuracy and the third was 65 per cent accurate.


Writing in the journal Cognition, the researchers said their experiment was a very simple mirror of the way children are taught words – by their parents pointing to pictures and asking them to name the object.


They said: ‘Our paradigm is not a direct analog of human word learning.



‘Nevertheless, it does offer a unique biological model of a critical property of word learning – namely, the fact that a learner must map many exemplars to many categories.’


Professor Wasserman added: ‘Unlike prior attempts to teach words to primates, dogs, and parrots, we used neither elaborate shaping methods nor social cues.


‘Our pigeons were trained on all 16 categories simultaneously, a much closer analog of how children learn words and categories.


‘Differences between humans and animals must indeed exist – many are already known – but, they may be outnumbered by similarities.


‘Our research on categorization in pigeons suggests that those similarities may even extend to how children learn words.’


The scientists taught the pigeons to group images of real objects into 16 distinct categories shown above.


Pigeons are known to be smarter than many birds and their homing instinct allows them to memorize their location and find their way home from hundreds of miles away.

Professor Bob McMurray, another psychologist who took part in the study, said the results showed that human learning is not as unique as was previously believed.


He said: ‘Children are confronted with an immense task of learning thousands of words without a lot of background knowledge to go on.


‘For a long time, people thought that such learning is special to humans.

‘What this research shows is that the mechanisms by which children solve this huge problem may be mechanisms that are shared with many species.’

270 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page